ESAL Calculations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prior to completing a pavement design, the Mn/DOT method requires that all traffic be converted into Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs), which is a means of equating various axle loads and configurations to the damage done by a number of 18,000 pound single axles with dual tires on pavements of specified strength over the design life of the pavement. There are four steps to forecasting cumulative ESALs. District traffic forecasters, the Traffic Forecast and Analysis Section, and consultants can provide assistance. The four steps are:
An electronic
spreadsheet called MNESALS, is available from the Traffic Forecast and
Analysis Section, or at the Traffic
Forecast and Analysis Section. Another spreadsheet is provided below. 1. Determination of Two-Way AADTTraffic Assessment is outlined here. The firsts step of the ESAL determination is to find the AADT. The second part involves assigning the total AADT into different vehicle classifications. AADT and/or Heavy commercial Average Daily Traffic (HCADT) forecasts may have already been approved during the Preliminary Design phase of a project's development. If no AADT forecasts exist, any of the following methods can be used to forecast traffic. Detailed descriptions of these methods and data collection techniques associated with each method can be obtained from Traffic Forecast and Analysis Section personnel.
Mn/DOT traffic flow maps are available from Mn/DOT and provide current estimates of AADT for the trunk highways, county road systems, and the municipal state aid system. If necessary, additional AADT estimates can be obtained from the Traffic Forecast and Analysis Section staff. 2. Determination of Two-way Vehicle Classification VolumesNext, assign a percentage of the total two-way AADT to each vehicle classification. The number of vehicle classifications depends on the number of uniquely defined, average ESAL factors. In Minnesota, there are eight sets of average ESAL factors that are generally used in ESAL forecasts. Number of axles and body configuration usually provide the basis for defining vehicle classifications when quantifying ESAL factors. Prior to assigning the vehicle distribution, evaluate the existing vehicle classification for a highway project segment, or segments close to the project. Vehicle classification site listing and maps are available from the Traffic Forecast and Analysis Section. If no data exists on or near the project, additional vehicle classification data should be collected. If data cannot be collected, refer to the table below (table 4-4.2 in the Geotechnical and Pavement Manual) for values that may be used to estimate vehicle classification volumes.
SU = Single Unit Trucks After determining current vehicle classification volumes for a site on a proposed highway project, determine how the volumes for each classification may change in the future. If historical data from the vehicle classification data record suggests that each vehicle classification volume as a percent of AADT has remained relatively stable through time, you may assume that future vehicle classification volumes can be estimated by multiplying each vehicle classification percent of current AADT by the AADT for the future year. If historical data or anticipated land development in the area suggests that one classification will increase or decrease at a different level, each classification can be projected independently. Documentation is required for all traffic assumptions and calculations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TH 99 | I-494 | I-94 | TH 2 | I-94 MnRoad | ||
| Vehicle Class | Default | a | b | c | d | c |
| Cars, Pick-ups | 0.0007 | |||||
| 2 ax, 6 tire SU | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| **3+ ax SU | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| 3 ax TST | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.59 |
| 4 ax TST | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| 5+ ax TST | 1.13 | 0.92 | 1.14 | 1.00 | 1.74 | 0.99 |
| *(6 ax TST) | 0.78 | 0.42 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| T w/tr, buses | 0.57 | |||||
| MTC buses | 1.25 | |||||
| Twin Trailers | 2.40 | 0.49 | 0.77 | 2.16 | 1.90 | 3.15 |
|
Vehicle Classes: |
Data taken from years: a = 1995, 1990 b = 1982-1985, 1990 c = 1990 d = 1984, 1985, 1990 |
|||||
|
*This vehicle class is not usually considered separately
in an ESAL forecast. |
||||||
| No. of lanes in a single direction | Design Lane Factor |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 0.9 |
| 3 | 0.7 |
| No. of lanes in two directions | |
| 2 | 0.5 |
| 4 | 0.45 |
| 6 | 0.35 |
ESAL Calculator:This on-line spreadsheet should only be used if you do not have access to the MNESALS electronic spreadsheet.